Separation & Airspace Safety

  • Home WIKI Separation & Airspace Saf....

Separation & Airspace Safety

Separation & Airspace Safety is a vast domain at the crossroad of many topics: separation standards, safety risks analysis, collision modelling, advanced mathematics and many more.

As far as Air Traffic Control is concerned, it normally starts with national authorities laying down vertical and horizontal separation standards to facilitate the safe navigation of aircraft in controlled airspace. Observance of these standards ensures safe separation from the ground, from other aircraft and from protected airspace. Separation standards may sometimes serve to reduce exposure to Wake Vortex Turbulence although there are many occurrences of significant wake vortex encounter at separations much greater than prevailing minimum separation.

National separation standards are based on the provisions of ICAO Doc 4444 (Procedures for Air Traffic Management), especially Chapter 5. Differences from these standards (if any) are published in national AIPs. The methods used to achieve separation are varied and complex, depending on the phase of flight and the relative trajectories of the aircraft involved (Skybrary, 2019), but they are generally classified in three categories: vertical, lateral, and longitudinal separation.

Separation can be achieved by distance or time reports and/or estimates (commonly referred to as procedural separation) or can be achieved through electronic means such as radar, ADS-B or multilateration (M-LAT) (commonly referred to as surveillance separation).

 

A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ICAO SEPARATION AND AIRSPACE SAFETY PANEL

With the advent of commercial turbo jet aircraft operating at high levels and the need to re-evaluate the vertical separation minimum used at that time, the Vertical Separation Panel (VSP) was created in 1954. Later on, the need to review other separation minima due to the fuel shortage in the 70s generated the need to expand the tasks of the Panel and in 1971 the Review of General Concept of Separation Panel (RGCSP) met for the first time. The Air Navigation Commission agreed in 2000 that the Review of the General Concept of Separation Panel (RGCSP) be changed to the Separation and Airspace Safety Panel (SASP). The Commission considered that the change of the panel would better reflect the broad scope of the panel’s work programme and provided an appropriate emphasis on ICAO’s primary objective to ensure airspace safety while improving efficiency of operations. (ICAO, 2014)

 

Separation Concept

In summary, is the concept of keeping an aircraft outside a minimum distance from another aircraft to reduce the risk of those aircraft colliding, as well as prevent accidents due to secondary factors, such as wake turbulence. Separation can also apply to terrain, obstacles, and controlled airspace, wherein an aircraft must stay at a minimum distance from a block of airspace.

Air traffic controllers apply rules, known as separation minima, to do this. Pairs of aircraft to which these rules have been successfully applied are said to be separated: the risk of these aircraft colliding is therefore remote. If separation is at risk of being lost between two aircraft, they are said to be in a conflict.

When an aircraft passes behind or follows another aircraft, wake turbulence minima are applied due to the effect of the wingtip vortices of the preceding aircraft on the following aircraft. These minima vary depending on the relative size of the two aircraft. This is acute on final approach with a smaller aircraft following larger aircraft. (Wikipedia, 2020)

What are ATC clearances for?

A clearance issued by ATC is predicated on known traffic. An ATC clearance means an authorization by ATC, for the purpose of preventing collision between known aircraft, for an aircraft to proceed under specified conditions within controlled airspace. The pilot-in-command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft. If ATC issues a clearance that would cause a pilot to deviate from a rule or regulation, or in the pilot’s opinion, would place the aircraft in jeopardy, it is the pilot’s responsibility to request an amended clearance.

Similarly, if a pilot prefers to follow a different course of action, such as make a 360 degree turn for spacing to follow traffic when established in a landing or approach sequence, land on a different runway, take off from a different intersection, take off from the threshold instead of an intersection, or delay operation, the pilot is expected to inform ATC accordingly. When the pilot requests a different course of action, however, the pilot is expected to cooperate so as to preclude disruption of traffic flow or creation of conflicting patterns. The pilot is also expected to use the appropriate aircraft call sign to acknowledge all ATC clearances, frequency changes, or advisory information. (FAA, 2020)


For more information, visit one of the following WIKIFATCA pages:

Separation & Airspace Safety 163

  1. AAS 1.11 “FLY-BY” AND “FLY-OVER” WAYPOINTS
  2. AAS 1.14 SPACE-BASED AUTOMATIC DEPENDENT SURVEILLANCE – BROADCAST
  3. AAS 1.15 CONCEPT OF GNSS-BASED ALTITUDE
  4. ADME 2.1 CONVERGING RUNWAY OPERATIONS (CROPS)
  5. ADME 2.4 SURFACE MOVEMENT GUIDANCE & CONTROL SYSTEMS
  6. ADS-B Operations
  7. Aerodrome – Land and Hold Short Operations
  8. Aerodrome – Converging Runway Operations
  9. Air Traffic Control Separation Monitoring Tool (ASMT)
  10. Air Traffic Control Separation Monitoring Tool (ASMT)
  11. Air Traffic Control Separation Monitoring Tool (ASMT)
  12. Airborne Separation Assurance
  13. Aircraft Flying with ‘Due Regard’
  14. Airspace Design and Procedures Controller Involvement
  15. Amendment to Current Policy on RNAV Procedural Separation Minima
  16. ASAS-TN2 – Airborne Separation Assistance System Thematic Network 2
  17. ATC Collision Avoidance Techniques
  18. ATS – Study Restrictions in the Enroute Environment
  19. ATS 3.10 GLOBAL COMPATIBLE FLIGHT LEVEL SYSTEMS
  20. ATS 3.16 (ADVANCED) STRATEGIC LATERAL OFFSET PROCEDURES
  21. ATS 3.17 THE USE OF SAFETY NETS IN ATM
  22. ATS 3.20 SHORT TERM CONFLICT ALERT
  23. ATS 3.21 AREA PROXIMITY WARNINGS
  24. ATS 3.23 MINIMUM SAFE ALTITUDE WARNING SYSTEMS
  25. ATS 3.25 SURVEILLANCE: IN-TRAIL PROCEDURES ITP
  26. ATS 3.33 MERGING AND SEQUENCING CONCEPTS
  27. ATS 3.36 RECATEGORIZATION OF AIRCRAFT FOR WAKE TURBULENCE
  28. ATS 3.38 TERRAIN AND OBSTACLE CLEARANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
  29. ATS 3.39 TERRAIN AND OBSTACLE CHARTING
  30. ATS 3.4 STANDARDISATION OF REGIONAL TRANSITION ALTITUDES
  31. ATS 3.40 EMERGENCY DESCENT PROCEDURES
  32. ATS 3.9 RADAR MONITORING
  33. Blended Airspace
  34. Co-operative Separation
  35. Concept of GNSS-Based Altitude
  36. Conspicuity and ATS Surveillance
  37. Cooperative Separation – Transfer of Control Functions to Pilots
  38. Development of Policy on Formation Flights Within Controlled Airspace
  39. Developments in the use of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) as an Approach Aid
  40. EATCHIP ATM Procedures Development Sub-Group
  41. Emergency Descent Procedures
  42. En-route Wake Turbulence
  43. Harmonised Transition Altitude
  44. HELI 5.1 HELICOPTER OPERATIONS
  45. Interactions ATC/ACAS
  46. Introduction of RVSM on a Trial Basis in the North Atlantic Region
  47. Investigate Applications of Provision of Area Proximity Warnings
  48. Investigate interactions between Traffic Collision Avoidance System and Mode S
  49. Investigate Minimum Safe Altitude Warning Systems (MSAW)
  50. Investigate Navigation and Surveillance Provided by a Single Position Information System
  51. Investigate Potential Applications of ADS-B
  52. Investigate Route Conformance Monitoring System
  53. Investigation of the Nomenclature used in the Acronyms CIB & CIC
  54. LM 11.1.4 TRANSFER OF CONTROL FUNCTIONS – LEGAL ASPECTS
  55. Longitudinal Separation Anomalous Interpretations
  56. Management of Mixed Mode Operations
  57. MLS Operational Procedures
  58. Monitor the Application and Implementation of RNAV
  59. Monitor the Developments in the Operational use of ASAS
  60. Monitoring TIBA
  61. NATSPG
  62. Off–Set Tracking in the North Atlantic (NAT)
  63. Policy Review: Strategic Lateral Offset Procedures (SLOP)
  64. Produce a Definition of Area Proximity Warning System
  65. Produce a Definition of Conflict Detection Tools
  66. Produce a Definition of Controller Tools
  67. Produce a Definition of Minimum Safe Altitude Warning Systems
  68. Produce Definition of Short Term Conflict Alert
  69. Produce Definitions of “Fly-by” and “Fly-over”
  70. Produce Definitions on Spacing, Separation and Segregation
  71. Professional and Legal Aspects of Downlinking TCAS RAs (TCAS Resolution Advisories)
  72. Radar Monitoring in the En-route Phase
  73. Radar Monitoring Procedures in TMAs
  74. Rating for Automatic Dependent Surveillance Control
  75. Reduced Vertical Separation Above FL 290
  76. Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM)
  77. Reduction in Vertical Separation Above FL290
  78. Reduction of Non-radar Separation Standards Using ADS
  79. Removal of Ground Based Aids
  80. Report of Visual Approach Procedures
  81. Responsibility For Terrain And Obstacle Clearance During Weather Avoidance
  82. Review ATS 3.36 – Recategorization of Aircraft for Wake Turbulence
  83. Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual
  84. Review Existing Policy and Develop Further Policy on Simultaneous IFR Operations on Intersecting / Converging Runways
  85. Review Issues in the Application of Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) in Advanced Surface Movement Guidance System (A-SMGCS) Operations
  86. Review Issues Regarding ATC Systems Capability to Monitor Relevant Controller Intervention Buffer (CIB) Parameters
  87. Review of Lateral and Longitudinal Separation
  88. Review of Lateral and Longitudinal Separation
  89. Review of LM (Legal Matters) – Professional Policy of the TPM
  90. Review of Policy in Regards to TCAS RA Downlink
  91. Review of Policy on Area Navigation
  92. Review of Policy on Ground Based Safety Nets
  93. Review of Policy on Precision Area Navigation
  94. Review of Policy on Surface Movement Radar
  95. Review of Policy: Non-plannable Level in the NAT-Region
  96. Review of Policy: Resumption of Separation Following a TCAS RA
  97. Review of Policy: Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA)
  98. Review of Provisional Policy – ATM Safety Monitoring Tools (ASMT)
  99. Review of TCAS Policy
  100. Review of WC (Working Conditions) – Professional Policy of the TPM
  101. Review policy of ACAS / TCAS
  102. Review Policy on Formation Flights within Controlled Airspace
  103. Review Policy on Interception of Civil Aircraft
  104. Review Policy on Separation Lateral and Longitudinal
  105. Review policy on Surface Guidance Movement and Control Systems
  106. Review the Issue of ASAS Separation when less than the Relevant ATC Separation, e.g. Radar
  107. Review the Issues Concerning Controller Intervention Buffer
  108. RNAV – Monitoring its Implementation
  109. RNAV Procedural Separation – Amendment of Current Policy
  110. RNAV Procedural Separation – Longitudinal Distance Standard Minima
  111. RNP for Approach and Landing
  112. RVSM
  113. Safety Components in a Separation Minima
  114. SEP 7.1 USE OF 1000FT VERTICAL SEPARATION ABOVE FL290
  115. SEP 7.2 LATERAL AND LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION
  116. SEP 7.3 FORMATION FLIGHTS WITHIN CONTROLLED AIRSPACE
  117. SEP 7.4 AIRBORNE SEPARATION ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS (ASAS) AND COCKPIT DISPLAY OF TRAFFIC INFORMATION (CDTI)
  118. SEP 7.5 CONTROLLER INTERVENTION BUFFER
  119. SEP 7.6 INTERCEPTION OF CIVIL AIRCRAFT
  120. SEP 7.7 DEFINITIONS: SPACING, SEPARATION & SEGREGATION
  121. SEP 7.8 VISUAL SEPARATION ON APPROACH
  122. Separation Between Departing and Arriving Aircraft – Cut-off Point (CoP)
  123. Separation Between Units Without Procedural Agreement
  124. Separation in Class E Airspace
  125. SICASP/WG2 Meeting
  126. Simultaneous Operations on Intersecting Runways
  127. Simultaneous Operations on Intersecting Runways
  128. Spacing, Separation and Segregation – Use in Future ATM Systems
  129. Study ADS-B Applications – Used in ITP
  130. Study Advanced Offset Procedures
  131. Study Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS) to Update IFATCA Provisional Policy
  132. Study Down Link of Traffic Collision Avoidance System Resolution Advisories
  133. Study Land and Hold Short Operations
  134. Study Merging and Sequencing Concepts
  135. Study Recategorization of Aircraft for Wake Turbulence
  136. Study Remote Towers Concept
  137. Study Reporting of TCAS RAs
  138. Study Strategic Lateral Offset Procedure
  139. Study Visual Separation on Approach
  140. Surveillance – Provide an update on ITP
  141. Surveillance Applications Policy – Applications of Radar Monitoring
  142. Surveillance Applications Policy – ASAS
  143. Surveillance Applications Policy – Review Policy on Radar Monitoring
  144. Surveillance Applications Policy – Review Policy on ADS
  145. Technical Aspects of Medium Term Conflict Detection
  146. Terrain and Obstacle Clearance Responsibilities
  147. Terrain Clearance and Airspace Design
  148. The Development of MLS Continues
  149. The Use of GNSS – ATC
  150. The Use of GNSS as a Runway Approach Aid
  151. The Use of Lateral Offsets
  152. The Use of Lateral Offsets
  153. The Use of Non-flight Plannable Levels in the Nat Region for Contingency
  154. The Use of Safety Nets in ATM
  155. Three Main Systems of Flight Level (FL) Determination
  156. TPM Review – ATS Editorials
  157. TPM Review – ATS (Major Edit)
  158. Transfer of Control Functions to Pilots (Legal Aspects)
  159. Transfer of Separation Functions to Pilots – Human Factors Aspects
  160. Vertical Spacing Between Controlled and Uncontrolled Aircraft at or near Airspace Boundaries
  161. WC 8.2.9 CO-OPERATIVE SEPARATION
  162. WC 8.7.7 SEPARATION BETWEEN UNITS WITHOUT PROCEDURAL AGREEMENT
  163. Weather Deviation Procedure in Asia-Pacific Region

Last Update: September 19, 2020  

October 27, 2019   176   superman    WIKI  

Comments are closed.


  • Search Knowledgebase